Non-Linear Effects of Leverage on Firm Value: Moderating Role of Size and Liquidity

Authors

  • Mela Nurdialy Program Studi Akuntansi, Sekolah Vokasi IPB University
  • Erwin Saraswati Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Akuntansi, Universitas Brawijaya
  • Haqi Fadillah Program Studi Akuntansi, Universitas Pakuan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35591/wahana.v29i2.994

Keywords:

Accounting-Based Firm Value, Firm Size, Leverage, Liquidity, Non-Linear Relationship

Abstract

This study investigates the non-linear relationship between leverage and accounting-based firm value, as well as the moderating effects of firm size and liquidity. Based on trade-off theory, leverage is hypothesized to exhibit an inverted U-shaped relationship with performance. The analysis utilizes a balanced panel of 65 consumer goods non-cyclical firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2022 to 2024 (195 firm-year observations), with data compiled directly from audited financial statements and standardized reporting units. Fixed-effects estimation with firm-clustered standard errors, employing ROA and ROE as performance indicators, shows no statistically significant inverted U-shaped relationship between leverage and accounting-based firm value: the quadratic leverage terms are insignificant for both performance measures, and the estimated turning points lie well outside the observed data range. The principal finding is a significant negative linear effect of leverage on ROA. Neither firm size nor liquidity significantly moderates this relationship. Robustness checks using an alternative leverage proxy (DAR) reveal an increasingly steep negative effect at higher debt ratios. The evidence suggests that financing behavior during the observation period is more consistent with pecking order theory than with the interior optimum predicted by trade-off theory, plausibly reflecting the predominance of debt costs over benefits during the high interest rate period of 2022–2024. Consequently, managers of primary consumer goods firms are advised to exercise caution when increasing debt, as additional leverage tends to reduce profitability under elevated funding costs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications.

Attia, E. F., Ezz Eldeen, H. H., & Daher, S. S. (2023). Size-threshold effect in the capital structure–firm performance nexus in the MENA region: A dynamic panel threshold regression model. Risks, 11(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11020023

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Laporan Perekonomian Indonesia 2022 (No. Publikasi 07300.2216). Badan Pusat Statistik.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Laporan Perekonomian Indonesia 2023 (No. Publikasi 07300.2311). Badan Pusat Statistik.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Laporan Perekonomian Indonesia 2024 (No. Publikasi 07300.24017). Badan Pusat Statistik.

Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Bank Indonesia. (2022). Laporan perekonomian Indonesia 2022: Sinergi memperkuat ketahanan dan kebangkitan menuju Indonesia maju. Bank Indonesia.

Bank Indonesia. (2023). Laporan perekonomian Indonesia 2023. Bank Indonesia.

Bank Indonesia. (2024). Laporan perekonomian Indonesia 2024. Bank Indonesia.

Biplob, M. N. K. (2025). Optimizing firm value: A panel threshold analysis of manufacturing firms’ capital structure listed in the Dhaka stock exchange. Journal of Management, Economics, and Industrial Organization, 9(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.31039/jomeino.2025.913

Bolarinwa, S. T., Onyekwelu, U. L., Ojiakor, I., Orga, J. I., Nwakaego, D. A., & Ekwutosi, O. C. (2026). Leverage and firm performance: Threshold evidence from the role of firm size. Global Business Review, 27(3), 559–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221109571

Botta, M., & Colombo, L. V. A. (2022). Non-linear capital structure dynamics. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 49(9–10), 1897–1928. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12596

Chang, E. V., & Wirianata, H. (2025). Leverage dynamics: The role of profitability and firm size in shaping firm value. International Journal of Application on Economics and Business, 3(2), 1084–1098. https://doi.org/10.24912/ijaeb.v3i2.1084-1098

Cuong, N. T. (2014). Threshold effect of capital structure on firm value: Evidence from seafood processing enterprises in the South Central region of Vietnam. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 3(3), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v3i3.186

Dalci, I. (2018). Impact of financial leverage on the profitability of listed manufacturing firms in China. Pacific Accounting Review, 30(4), 410–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-01-2018-0008

Endraria & Sagara, Y. (2025). When liquidity and governance shape firm value: Evidence from Indonesia’s consumer non-cyclicals sector. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v13i5.4165

Farooq, U., & Jibran, A. Q. (2017). Firm size as moderator to non-linear leverage-performance relation: An emerging market review. Binus Business Review, 8(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v8i2.1711

Flannery, M. J., & Öztekin, Ö. (2024). Working capital balances and financial policy. Journal of Corporate Finance, 87, 102618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102618

Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2009). Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important? Financial Management, 38(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01026.x

García-Gómez, C. D., Bilgin, M. H., Demir, E., & Díez-Esteban, J. M. (2021). Leverage and performance: The case of the U.S. hospitality industry. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 5(2), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2021010

Harasheh, M., & De Vincenzo, F. (2023). Leverage-value nexus in Italian small-medium enterprises: Further evidence using dose-response function. EuroMed Journal of Business, 18(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-11-2021-0166

Jaisinghani, D., & Kanjilal, K. (2017). Non-linear dynamics of size, capital structure, and profitability: Empirical evidence from the Indian manufacturing sector. Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2016.12.003

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kenny, C., Maryati, Fibrianti, I., Dosinta, N. F., Yunita, K., & Heniwati, E. (2024). Determinan nilai perusahaan LQ45 dengan ukuran perusahaan sebagai variabel pemoderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.29103/jak.v12i1.13113

Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1973). A state-preference model of optimal financial leverage. The Journal of Finance, 28(4), 911–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01415.x

Matemilola, B. T., Bany-Ariffin, A. N., Azman-Saini, W. N. W., & Nassir, A. M. (2016). Non-linearity in debt and return relationship: Evidence from the dynamic panel threshold method. Journal of Applied Sciences, 16(9), 438–444. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2016.438.444

Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporate finance, and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.

Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. The American Economic Review, 53(3), 433–443.

Mumpuni, Y. T., & Hapsari, D. W. (2025). The moderating effect of firm size on the relationship between capital structure and profitability on firm value. American Journal of Economic and Management Business, 4(7), 1040–1050. https://doi.org/10.58631/ajemb.v4i7.285

Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0

Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 574–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03646.x

Myers, S. C. (2001). Capital structure. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.2.81

Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0

Nassim, I., Nassim, S., & Moussa, A. (2025). Financial leverage and firm performance in Moroccan agricultural SMEs: Evidence of nonlinear dynamics. International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(3), 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13030164

Ngoc, B. T., & Trang, P. K. (2023). Nonlinear impact of financial leverage on profits: Case of listed companies in Vietnam. Economics and Business Quarterly Reviews, 6(2), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.06.02.506

Nikhil, M. N., Shenoy, S. S., Chakraborty, S., & Lithin, B. M. (2024). Is the nexus between capital structure and firm performance asymmetric? An emerging market perspective. Cogent Economics & Finance, 12(1), 2296195. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2296195

Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn053

Putri, R. N., Basri, Y. M., & Hanif, R. A. (2025). Pengaruh struktur modal dan likuiditas terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan ukuran perusahaan sebagai variabel moderasi. Economic Reviews Journal, 4(4), 2042–2058. https://doi.org/10.56709/mrj.v4i4.927

Qoyim, I., Akhmadi, M. N., & Isnanto, R. N. (2024). The role of liquidity in moderating the relationship between capital structure and financial performance (empirical study on industrial companies for the period 2018–2022 listed on the IDX). International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 7(7), 4686–4695. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i07-19

Rahmadany, A. N., & Risfandy, T. (2022). Struktur modal optimal pada nilai perusahaan: Pandemi Covid-19. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Multidisiplin (SinaMu), 4, 243–251. https://doi.org/10.31000/sinamu.v4i1.7897

Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421–1460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05184.x

Saona, P., Renzi, A., Vagnani, G., & Taragoni, P. (2025). Environmental impact-adjusted firm value and debt: A multi-country analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70465

Tulcanaza-Prieto, A. B., Lee, Y., & Anzules-Falcones, W. (2024). The moderating role of corporate governance in the relationship between leverage and firm value: Evidence from the Korean market. Risks, 12(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12010011

Vuković, B., Peštović, K., Saković, D., & Ilić, T. (2025). Company value analysis: Empirical evidence from Western Europe. The Annals of the Faculty of Economics in Subotica, 61(53), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.5937/AnEkSub2500001V

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Yarba, İ. (2023). Does the inverted U-shaped relationship between corporate indebtedness and investment hold up in emerging markets? Evidence from Türkiye. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(Suppl.), S75–S83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2023.11.002

Yun, J., Ahmad, H., Jebran, K., & Muhammad, S. (2021). Cash holdings and firm performance relationship: Do firm-specific factors matter? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 1283–1305. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1823241

Downloads

Published

2026-08-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Non-Linear Effects of Leverage on Firm Value: Moderating Role of Size and Liquidity. (2026). Wahana: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 29(2), 216-234. https://doi.org/10.35591/wahana.v29i2.994

Similar Articles

71-80 of 167

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.